Plants ordered today will be shipped in the Spring 2023.

Black Cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa) potted plant, organic

$10.50$27.50

Family:  Crowfoot (Ranunculaceae)

Hardy to zones 4 to 10

(The Latin name Cimicifuga racemosa is synonymous with the Latin name Actaea racemosa)

Herbaceous perennial native to the forest understory of the eastern hardwood forests, especially northern Appalachia, with the gene center occurring probably in the mountains of West Virginia. Perfectly cold hardy and an excellent garden introduction which has actually been absorbed into the horticulture trade in Europe as an exotic ornamental. The plant prefers part shade and moist, rich soils. A good top dressing with organic compost and a finish with forest-derived mulch will produce monumental plants with multiple upright, white-flowering racemes.

Potted plant, Certified Organically Grown

Share your thoughts!

Let us know what you think...

What others are saying

  1. One person found this helpful

    Question

    Ian Maas

    Hi Richo, I have a question about cohosh species. Local herbalists seem equally confused. I have several species growing. A green species with a sort of unpleasant smell that flowers mid summer. It has aggressive roots and seems to get everywhere. I also have another green species that flowers late summer, has a more pleasant smelling flower (if a little musky). A much more tidy plant with a clumping habit. And then of course there are the purples! Maybe from crosses with Asian species?
    Anyway, Dan Hinkley calls it “…hopelessly muddled genus”.
    Gray’s Manual of Botany refers to 3 species. C. Americana (summer cohosh). C racemosa ( black cohosh) and C. Cordifolia (gray). Which is the most commonly (or best) used medicinal species? Your book references the racemosa. I have seen references to categorization based on seeds produced per flower?
    Care to weigh in on this? I’d love to hear what you know.
    Thanks

    (1) (0)

    Something wrong with this post? Thanks for letting us know. If you can point us in the right direction...

    • Richo Cech

      Richo Cech

      hello ian. nice to hear from you. I do think that the reassignment of Cimicifuga to Actaea was a mistake and caused additional confoundment. After all, Black Cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa) holds its seeds in a follicle, while baneberries (Actaea rubra, pachypoda, etc.) make drupes. Therefore I have refused to go with Acteae racemosa and continue on using the traditional genus adage, which does limit confusion. Your real black cohosh does not have invasive roots. It is clumping, makes a white flower that smells a bit carrion-like, resulting in a tall raceme of follicles. Flowering time is going to differ depending on location–Our’s are barely starting to make seedpods right now. Frankly a bit surprised that local herbalists would be confused on this–baneberry is pretty obviously not black cohosh, unless you’re out in the woods digging dormant roots, which at this point in history is frowned upon. Pages 24 to 25 of my book “Growing At-Risk” delves deeper into the Cimicifuga/Baneberry befuddlement. Richo

      (0) (0)

      Something wrong with this post? Thanks for letting us know. If you can point us in the right direction...

×

Login

Register

A link to set a new password will be sent to your email address.

Continue as a Guest

Don't have an account? Sign Up